Magimix 12-cup Food Processor by Robot Coupe 3200 Xl Review

We independently enquiry, test, review, and recommend the best products—larn more about our process. If you buy something through our links, we may earn a commission.

Straight to the Indicate

Our favorite 14-loving cup nutrient processors are the Magimix 14-Cup Food Processor and Cuisinart xiv-Cup Food Processor. The former is incredibly powerful, comes with a host of attachments, and is fairly serenity when on. The latter is our upkeep-friendly pick. It doesn't come with many attachments, but has a straight-forward design that'due south incredibly user-friendly. We as well have top picks for 16- and 12-cup food processors: the Breville 16-Cup Sous Chef Peel & Dice Food Processor and Breville Sous Chef 12 Cup Nutrient Processor.

For a food processor to earn its keep, information technology should be a countertop workhorse that chops and slices at lightning speed and turns blocks of cheese into dairy streamers without a single grated knuckle. When you're shoving a potato downwards the feed tube of a powerful nutrient processor, you can't help but grin at how shine and fast it does the task.

And however, if there'southward ane piece of kitchen gear that elicits groans from the Serious Eats culinary team when they have to lug it out, it'south the food processor. For those with eatery-grade knife skills, speed lonely isn't always a big selling point. When you lot add upward the time it takes to get the 20-pound appliance out, set it up, use information technology, then clean it, it tin can oft feel like more trouble than it'south worth.

That aversion to food processors isn't because the car itself is inherently bad. The culprit is those hordes of poorly designed ones, and at that place are many. Setting a bad food processor up simply to accept it indiscriminately hack at your vegetables, take a large chunk of Parmesan for a spin under the lid, or fling soup onto your walls doesn't exactly elicit a want to use it regularly.

A good food processor is another matter entirely. It's easy to employ, and it's quiet, quick, and effective. It pulls doughs together in a matter of seconds with no boosted kneading required. It turns nuts into flour, beans into purées, and large chunks of aromatic vegetables into a fine mince with but a momentary blitz of the twirling bract.

The trouble, in the end, is price. Because information technology's such a popular slice of kitchen gear, manufacturers have tried to brand a model for only about every budget. Y'all tin discover some for less than $100, and others for v times as much. Do y'all really need to spend top dollar? And if non, how depression can yous go before the savings just aren't worth the piece of crap y'all end upward with? To find the all-time food processors across a spectrum of price points, we tested eleven models, ranging from 12- to sixteen-cup capacities. Our winners are the ones that are worth lugging out of the chiffonier over again and again and again.

The Winners, at a Glance

The Best xiv-Cup Nutrient Processor: Magimix 14-Cup Food Processor

The Magimix has a few pattern elements that elevated it to the top of our list, including a chopping blade that nearly touches the side of the bowl for complete and efficient processing, an innovative dough blade shape that kneaded pizza dough improve than any other machine we tested, and nesting 12- and half-dozen-loving cup piece of work bowls that offer increased flexibility. It never and so much as broke a sweat in any of our tests, all while boasting 1 of the quieter motors of the lot. The brand name of this car may not ring a bell for many readers, but it comes from good stock: This is the prosumer line from Robot Coupe, the company that makes the food processors used in but about every eatery and commercial kitchen.

The Best Budget xiv-Loving cup Food Processor: Cuisinart fourteen-Cup Food Processor

While this classic from Cuisinart is far from the cheapest auto on the marketplace, information technology'south equally cheap as we're willing to recommend based on our tests. At near half the cost of larger, 16-cup models, it handles the basics with ease, efficiently grating semi-firm and hard cheeses, pulling doughs together—despite non having a specialty blade—and slicing potatoes and tomatoes without destroying them. Rather quiet, information technology has a uncomplicated two-button command for easy pulsing and continuous processing. Merely don't await an array of accessories or a parts caddy.

The Best 16-Cup Food Processor: Breville xvi-Cup Sous Chef Skin & Dice Nutrient Processor

The Breville Sous Chef fell simply backside the Magimix in core functioning, but it made upwardly for it in capacity and intelligent design. It comes with a bombardment of well-designed attachments, including an adjustable slicing blade that's capable of producing a wide range of thicknesses. It's besides incredibly intuitive to gather and apply, and, despite its size, it was nearly the quietest model we tested. Plus, a built-in timer helps yous continue tabs on your work.

The Best 12-Cup Nutrient Processor: Breville Sous Chef 12-Loving cup Food Processor

This Breville Sous Chef is a smaller, slightly less powerful version of the 16-cup model, just it still has enough musculus to bring dough together effortlessly. It, too, has an adjustable slicing disk that made short work of potatoes without excessive waste material. When filled with nearly four cups of h2o, the Breville didn't leak a drib—which is more than we can say for several of the xiv-cup machines we tested.

Directives telling you lot which fashion to turn the work bowl or lid brand working with the food processor easier.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The Criteria: What Nosotros Look for in a Nifty Nutrient Processor

Many of the food processors bachelor today seem to justify their cost tag past offering a parade of attachments designed for ever-more than-specific tasks. I model came with a plastic disk that whisks egg whites, while another included a flimsy wire beater that fit within the work bowl. A few models claimed to go across mere slicing and shredding past offer a dicing zipper; those didn't work and so well. Such bonus attachments are nice when they work, but ultimately, a nutrient processor needs to be judged past how well it performs its core set of tasks—slicing, chopping, grating, puréeing, and kneading. When a processor is good at those, that's when nosotros can justify dragging it out of storage.

What is a Food Processor and Practice Y'all Need One?

A food processor does things that y'all otherwise might do with a good chef'south knife, a box grater, a mortar and pestle, or your hands. That is to say, information technology slices, grates, minces, kneads, and purees. It doesn't do all of those things as well every bit the more transmission alternatives, but information technology certainly does them more apace and easily; and in some cases, such as with kneading and building gluten in a dough, the power of the processor motor can piece of work to your advantage.

While a person can certainly brand practise without a food processor, it adds some serious convenience and speed to many kitchen tasks. If your idea of a good fourth dimension isn't continuing in a kitchen finely mincing pounds of onions, carrots, celery, and garlic by manus for an hour, simply to make a soffritto for ragù bolognese, a food processor will more than prove its worth.

Information technology's also of import to note that, while at that place'south some overlap, a nutrient processor is not the same thing as a blender. They both have motors that power spinning blades, only the shape of the processor bowl versus the blender jar and other variables make each better suited to sure tasks. You lot tin utilize either to make mayonnaise, merely a blender volition more efficiently puree liquids to a smooth consistency for, say, a breakfast smoothie. A food processor, on the other manus, will handle thicker and dryer ingredients like chickpeas and raw vegetables with more ease, quickly producing hummus or finely minced vegetables without much trouble.

All the food processors nosotros tested have a similar construction: A heavy motor turns a spindle that can be fitted with various blades or disks inside a work bowl and hat. The spindle either sticks up through a pigsty in the work bowl so that an attachment tin can be ready directly on it, or it engages, blender-style, with a gear built into the work basin that then powers any attachment is connected to it. In our tests, the latter blueprint was less decumbent to leakage, since at that place is no pigsty in the work bowl base.

In all cases, the work bowls twist and click onto the base. After that, the lid usually twists to lock onto the work bowl, though some companies are experimenting with different lid-locking mechanisms. In many cases, the bowl and lid assembly are a one-two punch of frustration, specially since there'south no consistency from one company to the adjacent on which direction to turn the bowl and lid to lock them. Even later on working with the machines for days on end, we oftentimes fumbled with many of them before getting them into action-set up position. We awarded points to models that included directional arrows or printed labels that help you align the motor, work bowl, and hat. Once locked in, nearly lids have their feed tubes nearest the user, which we adopt to builds that identify the tube on the far side, an bad-mannered design that forces you to accomplish across the top to transport ingredients down into the machine.

In terms of size, we think a 14-cup model strikes the right balance for most homes, because it can handle all only the biggest holiday-meal prep, notwithstanding still fits on a pantry shelf or inside a base of operations cabinet. A 12-cup model may be a improve selection for small kitchens, though even this requires a fair corporeality of storage space. Big-capacity, 16-loving cup models, meanwhile, are bigger than most of u.s. need, but if y'all regularly feed a crowd, it might exist worth sizing upward just to avoid having to procedure ingredients in batches.

A Notation About Motors

The models in our tests ranged from 420 to 1,300 watts. The thing is, motor wattage is the RPM of the countertop-appliance earth: Consumers are trained to look for it, and marketers never miss an opportunity to cite those impressive-looking figures. But watts are a measure of the ability consumed by the motor and not an indicator of how efficiently the motor uses that power, nor the overall quality of the machine'due south build. You tin can use wattage to roughly gauge which models accept bigger motors, but that won't always atomic number 82 y'all to a ameliorate food processor. Simply to name 1 key case, the most power-hungry unit nosotros tested failed to go far into the top four, even though some other food processor from the same manufacturer did—despite using roughly 550 fewer watts.

The more expensive machines, and all of our winners, accept induction motors. Unlike a traditional motor pattern, which needs carbon pads to transfer current and turn the shaft, an induction motor passes current through a stack of steel rings, creating a magnetic field that spins the motor without that concrete connection. This means less friction, heat, racket, and mechanical vesture. In our tests, induction food processors averaged around 73 decibels when spinning a blade in an empty piece of work basin, which is equivalent to the volume of a normal conversation happening three feet away from yous.

Both Brevilles feature a 24-bespeak adjustable slicing deejay that works well and can be set to zero, which reduces the chance of accidentally cutting yourself.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

Parts and Accessories

All of the machines came packaged with a minimum of three basic attachments: a serrated, S-shaped bract for chopping, mixing, and puréeing; a deejay with a raised bract for slicing; and a disk with cutouts for grating. Sometimes a single deejay incorporated both grating and slicing, one on either side, which meant one less matter to shop. All of the S-shaped blades had serrations along the cutting edge, some more prominent than others. Nosotros believe the serrations, similar those on a serrated kitchen knife, offer a longer-lived cutting edge than a dual beveled edge.

Some brands offer an adjustable slicing disk that allows you to choose from a wide range of thicknesses, from nearly 0.5 to vii.5 millimeters. It's a great option when it works, and confers a small condom do good, as the blade can be lowered until it'southward flush with the disk'due south surface, hiding the cutting edge. When it doesn't work, though, information technology's a disaster. I model that we disqualified had an adjustable slicing disk that couldn't hold its setting when subjected to the processor'due south spinning force; thin slices would rapidly abound fat as the blade spun out of position.

Most all the brands we tested included a plastic dough blade as a quaternary zipper. Not about every bit broad as the South blade, the dough blade is designed, presumably, to reduce drag on the motor as information technology swings around heavy dough. Some models include a storage tray with labels for all the parts, which can be just about as large as the food processor itself. Without one of those, you're on your own to store the boosted parts.

Another popular feature on many models is a smaller work basin and smaller blade that fit inside the primary one. The secondary bowl is typically around 5 cups in size, though our winning Magimix model includes a 12-cup insert, too. It's dainty to have a mini chopper congenital into a larger processor, but some models leaked when nosotros added fifty-fifty a minor corporeality of wet ingredients to that smaller bowl.

The Testing

Our testing focused on the core capabilities of food processors—namely, how well each chopped, sliced, puréed, grated, and pulled together heavy dough. Nearly as of import was how like shooting fish in a barrel information technology was to gather, disassemble, and operate each auto. Our testing can't predict long-term immovability, but we'll go along to use our winners and will update the review based on further experience.

Test ane: Slicing Tomatoes and Potatoes

Adjustable slicing blades, when they work, can make paper-thin tomato slivers like this.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

In theory, the slicing disk should turn produce into a cracking stack of uniformly thick cuts. To see how well our field of processors could do this in reality, we pushed both ripe plum tomatoes and firm russet potatoes through each feed tube into the food processor's slicing disk.

While most machines had the ability to slice well, the meliorate ones created smoother, cleaner slices with less waste. In the case of tomatoes, successful models could slice the fruit without smashing and juicing it in the process. With machines that offered multiple slice-thickness options, nosotros ran tomatoes through a range of widths, from the thinnest up to the thickest. The all-time could cut an un-mangled piece sparse plenty to permit light pass through.

All the food processors we tested cut potatoes, but the best ones did it while generating no more than two% waste.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

To test slicing potatoes, nosotros settled on roughly ii.five-millimeter-thick cuts (confirmed with digital calipers), a size most of the disks could conform. Nosotros calculated not just the quality of the slice just also the corporeality of waste matter generated. Almost of our winners kept the waste matter down to about 2%, while sloppier models lost near 3.5%.

Feed tube size came into play in these tests—some were then narrow that even a plum tomato wouldn't fit through. Wider tubes are improve, since they can conform foods in a wider range of sizes, including a whole spud. It's important to annotation, though, that smaller foods can get thrown around inside a broad feed tube as the blade spins below, leading to a strange series of oblique cuts. (The solution is to first determine the direction in which the bract spins—clockwise or counterclockwise—then position the nutrient confronting the side of the feed tube opposite from where the blade approaches, so that the tube wall acts as a brace.)

Test 2: Doughs

Of all the plastic dough blades we tested, the Magimix's version, with its turned-down flap, was the near constructive.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

While slicing is nearly a blade's speed and sharpness, pulling a dough together relies on pure brawn. A good food processor should be able to handle both. About models included a plastic dough bract, except for our winning Cuisinart model, which calls for using the metal chopping bract to mix doughs (though a dough blade is an optional accompaniment).

To see how well they could handle the task, we made two-thirds of a batch of Kenji'due south New York–Style Pizza Dough in each work basin. First, we attempted to combine the dry ingredients (flour, sugar, common salt, and yeast) with just four pulses. The Magimix was the only machine to consummate this with a dough blade, while others required either additional pulses or, in many cases, the intervention of a spatula to stir things around. Interestingly, our winning Cuisinart—the model that didn't have a dough blade and instead called for using the S-fashion metal blade—successfully incorporated the dry ingredients, besides.

Next, we added water and permit the processor run for 30 seconds. If, after those thirty seconds, the ingredients had formed a nice dough ball, we turned it out of the work bowl and proceeded to kneading. If not, we would allow the machine to continue processing until a good dough brawl had formed, noting how much longer it had to run before this stage was reached.

Subsequently that, nosotros hand-kneaded each batch, recording how much extra time was required to work the dough balls until they were smooth and elastic. The more gluten the food processor was able to develop during its mixing, the less manus-kneading the dough would crave later. The Magimix was as well the but model to piece of work the dough well enough that information technology didn't need any additional kneading after the processing step—plus, information technology pulled the dough together in far less than 30 seconds. The Cuisinart—without a dough blade—was the second all-time at kneading dough, requiring only well-nigh 40 seconds of extra handwork. Compare that to i batch that required three and a half minutes of extra mitt-kneading.

Nosotros had questions almost the conclusion to not require a specialized dough blade in this model, simply Cuisinart told us the company isn't particularly worried about premature motor failure as a result of using the S-style metal blade for dough, considering the bearings around the shaft, often susceptible to failure with hard apply, are designed to outlast the motor.

Test iii: Puréeing Dips

Food processors with Southward blades that about touched the sides of the work bowl aced our chopping, mixing, and puréeing tests.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

While a blender volition give yous the smoothest purée, a good nutrient processor should withal be able to deliver a uniformly smooth consistency across a range of foods, specially thick ones that might reject to period in a blender'south vortex.

We added garlic and lemon juice to the main work bowls (or mini ones, where available) to exam puréeing and leaking as we fabricated tahini sauce. Some models never fabricated it past chopping the garlic. The all-time mini work bowl performance came from the Magimix, after we discovered how to properly get together the nesting bowls to prevent leaking. The smaller, 12-cup Breville did a better job of combining the garlic and lemon than the splash-decumbent 2.5-loving cup work bowl in the larger, xvi-cup model. Then nosotros moved the tahini into the large piece of work bowl of each machine, added cooked chickpeas, and timed how long each model needed to bring together a uniformly smooth hummus. The good news is that all the machines passed this test in under a minute; our winners did information technology at the 30- or 40-second mark.

Examination iv: Chopping Aromatic Vegetables and Almond Flour

A food processor should be able to chop-chop and evenly chop vegetables. While some achieved this, others roughed upward the carrots, onions, and celery until they released water.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The classic combination of onion, carrot, and celery forms the backbone of many cuisines. In France, when diced, it is known as mirepoix. In Italy, it's often chopped much more finely, at which point it's known as a battuto; when cooked, this becomes a soffritto, which is an essential flavor base in ragù, sauces, and braises. It tin can be a small pain to properly mince vegetables for a battuto by manus. A food processor can make this relatively painless, merely only if information technology does the task well, creating a consequent mince that isn't crushed and battered to the point of becoming a juicy soup.

To examination this, we filled each model with the aforementioned ratio of large diced carrots, celery, and onions. We and then processed each batch while timing it, stopping to evaluate the cut consistency. The work bowls of the 16-cup Breville and 14-loving cup Magimix were filled with compatible cuts at fifteen seconds. Compare that to one budget model that pushed the chopped veggies to the side of the work basin, where the blade could no longer reach them, forcing us to stop, take the hat off, and scrape the sides with a spatula.

Grinding almonds into flour, so passing the results through a sieve, gave us a clear picture of which chopping blades were the nearly effective.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

To get a more measurable idea of chopping consistency, we ground 300 grams of whole almonds into flour in each machine, and then forced the flour through a fine-mesh strainer, weighing whatever was likewise large to laissez passer through. Most of our winners did well in this test, leaving behind no more than 25 grams of flour; however, the Cuisinart fell short here, creating well-nigh twice every bit many large almond particles as the other peak performers.

Exam 5: Grating Semi-Firm and Hard Cheeses

In a like consequence to the potato exam, the better food processors uniformly grated cheese, leaving picayune waste trapped betwixt the disk and the lid.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

You lot might consider mincing a battuto past hand a adventure to work on your knife skills, but no one looks at grating cheese as an opportunity to better their mitt-shredding prowess. Nosotros wanted a nutrient processor that could produce long, uniform shreds of a semi-firm cheese, preferably from a grater with large holes, and a snowy mountain of difficult-cheese shavings from a disk with tightly packed cutters.

For this test, we weighed blocks of Gruyère and Parmesan cheese, so pushed each through the advisable shredder. We weighed any leftover scraps to calculate waste matter. Some models failed to successfully shred as much as 24% of harder Parmesan cheese, which proved to be the more difficult of the two. A couple of food processors turned the Parm into long, spaghetti-similar strands, which aren't actually useful for a cheese that's not prized as a melter.

User Experience

Nosotros filled each work bowl with water, then let the auto rip to check for leaks.

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

Throughout testing, we assembled and disassembled each auto multiple times, swapping out attachments, washing parts, and clicking in bowls, lids, and more than. During these steps, we noticed which details made using the machines easier, and which frustrated usa.

On top of that, nosotros used a decibel meter to measure how much noise each model made, and filled each with h2o to its liquid max to check for leaking.

While our winners are all capable machines, they're not exactly lite or small-scale. Our smallest model, the 12-cup Breville, weighs xvi pounds and is just under 18 inches alpine, which is the standard backsplash summit below upper cabinets. A nutrient processor is but non a compact machine.

How We Chose Our Winners

The winning food processors had to handle each of our cadre tests and exist easy to utilise. All food processors are somewhat cumbersome to pause down and wash, merely we're less likely to heed that if they practise those core jobs well. We eliminated models that failed at key tasks or had obvious design flaws, like one that mangled the sliced-tomato test and and so leaked heavily when we filled information technology with water below its stated max capacity. Some other car's Due south-style blade and spindle nearly fused when nosotros attempted to chop dates, all earlier the motor eventually gave up the ghost.

What we plant, non surprisingly, was a correlation between price and performance, with the pricier machines finishing toward the top. Most of our picks are high-end machines with impressive capabilities. In the terminate, these terms are relative—no one has still managed to make a truly inexpensive nutrient processor that's worth buying. As mentioned above, our testing can't predict long-term immovability, but we'll continue to use our winners and update our review based on further utilise.

The Best 14-Loving cup Food Processor: Magimix 14-Cup Food Processor

What we liked: The Magimix impressed the states with smooth performance that never felt underpowered. An induction motor kept the machine quiet as it ran through our tests, including building pizza dough well enough that it didn't crave whatever additional kneading. Imagine: In just 30 seconds, you'll accept enough fully developed dough to make four personal pizzas. The chopping bract successfully prepared a uniform and juice-free battuto in about fifteen seconds. A wide feed tube fabricated slicing whole produce a snap, though, if y'all're not careful, the food tin exist thrown sideways, leading to ugly slices. It was the virtually efficient model at slicing potatoes, yielding only one.33% waste. Its tomato slices, meanwhile, were flawless, save for the faintest traces of the bract's serrations.

What we didn't like: While the buttons are straightforward, assembly can exist tricky. At first, we thought the automobile had a serious leaking problem, until nosotros realized that an included "blending" ring had to be used with all fluids to keep them independent. Granted, with close reading of the manual, we would take avoided this mistake, and then perhaps the fault is ours to own—only user manuals get lost, and a friend or guest in the kitchen may one solar day use the car without having read all the instructions. A more than intuitive design would proceed people on the right path, no matter how closely they followed the printed instructions. Nosotros'd adopt to have directional linguistic communication printed on the work bowl and motor to better guide users. For the price tag, we'd also love to substitution the plastic egg-whisk attachment for an adjustable slicing blade, or a wider diverseness of fixed slicing blades than the two the car comes with. (More sizes are available every bit add together-ons for an actress cost.)

Included accessories: xiv-cup piece of work bowl, 12-loving cup insert work bowl, half dozen-cup insert mini work basin, S-shaped metal bract, smaller S-shaped bract for mini work bowl, 2mm and 4mm slicing disks, 2mm and 4mm grating disks, dough blade, blender ring, egg whisk, spatula, accompaniment storage box

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The Best Upkeep 14-Loving cup Nutrient Processor: Cuisinart fourteen-Cup Nutrient Processor

What we liked: The biggest knock confronting the Cuisinart might besides be its all-time feature: It comes with two disks (i for slicing and one for grating), a blade, a transmission, and little else. That might make it easy to dismiss, but the Cuisinart does a very good job across the core functions of a food processor, from chopping to shredding. A lot of the other inexpensive food processors out there could take a folio or 2 out of this Cuisinart model's playbook past focusing on getting those main functions right and ditching the plethora of inevitably crappy attachments. In that location'south a reason this Cuisinart is a archetype, and it's reassuring to meet that the company hasn't taken its centre off the ball by trying to emulate and then many of the misguided competitors that accept entered the fray.

The Cuisinart's simple and iconic 2-button pattern is intuitive to use. Information technology was besides the lowest-priced induction-motor food processor we tested, stumbling only when chopping almonds to a consistent particle size—information technology finished last amongst our group of winners on that job. Cuisinart is confident the motor will survive making dough with the metal chopping bract, so we don't run into any reason to purchase a dissever dough bract.

What we didn't like: A few small-scale issues—like the chute design with a pusher that hands falls out when inverted (unless it'south locked in identify), and a lid that positions the feed tube away from you, forcing you lot to reach across the car—gave us some momentary annoyance. If you intend to make large batches of puréed soups, you might want to consider another machine, as the Cuisinart's liquid max is a relatively shallow 2.75 cups.

Included accessories: 14-cup work basin, South-shaped metal blade, 4mm slicing disk, medium grating disk, spatula

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The Best 16-Cup Food Processor: Breville 16-Cup Sous Chef Peel & Die Food Processor

What we liked: This large Breville Sous Chef and its smaller, 12-cup cousin are the about convenient food processors we tested. From easy-to-follow arrows indicating which way to turn and lock the bowl and lid, to graduated volumes (in cups, fluid ounces, and liters) on the exterior of the work bowl and a max-make full line for both sparse and thick liquids, the Breville is easy to assemble, use, and take apart. While this model didn't leak a drop when processing five cups of water, its smaller, nesting work bowl did leak when we pulsed a wet ingredient in it. Otherwise, the Breville finished at or near the top in many of our tests. It excelled, in particular, at chopping consistency—it was the best at grinding whole almonds into powdery flour. The adjustable slicing blade was also a pleasure to use, offering 24 thickness settings, from 0.3 to eight millimeters. (Getting lycopersicon esculentum slices on the thinnest setting was difficult, only we were able to cut consequent millimeter-thick slices on setting 2, four.13-millimeter slices on setting 5, and half dozen.v-millimeter slices on setting 8.) The disk's condom position, which keeps the sharp edge retracted when in storage, prevents accidental dings and cuts. A built-in timer automatically tracks processing duration, making it dead like shooting fish in a barrel to know just how long you lot've let the automobile run.

In contrast with the direct drive shaft in most food processors, the Breville uses a brawl bearing attachment to connect to the piece of work basin, like a blender does. This lets you lot lift the bowl and blade off the motor without worrying about leaks, and there's no threading the spindle back through the bowl when you lot supersede information technology.

What nosotros didn't like: While we capeesh the large range of accessories the Breville comes with, the storage caddy is very big—though, presumably, if you're ownership a 16-cup food processor that weighs almost xxx pounds and is 17.75 inches tall, you accept the storage space for the accessories. We were likewise disappointed to see information technology struggle with the uncomplicated task of blending dry ingredients during the dough test; just with the help of a spatula was information technology able to whip them together.

Included accessories: 16-cup work bowl, 2.5-cup insert work bowl, Due south-shaped metallic blade, smaller Due south-shaped blade for mini work bowl, 0.three- to 8mm adjustable slicing deejay, fine and fibroid reversible grating deejay, dough blade, julienne disk, dicing kit, French fry disk, peeling disc, whisking disc, spatula, cleaning brush, accessory storage box

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The Best 12-Cup Food Processor: Breville Sous Chef 12-Cup Nutrient Processor

What we liked: The smaller Breville Sous Chef has many of the larger version's characteristics: same convenient pattern, same quality build, aforementioned excellent adjustable slicing disk, and same smart bowl-to-motor attachment. While the 12-cupper lacks the built-in timer of its larger cousin and is packaged with fewer disks and accessories, it'south a capable cutter that is tranquillity and smooth-running. It sliced tomatoes across a range of thicknesses without mangling them into soup, and left less than 2% waste on potatoes.

What we didn't like: The parts caddy isn't very useful, and, for the price, we'd similar to encounter a smaller, 5-cup work bowl, besides. One tip: Stick with pulsing when chopping vegetables, since, if left to run, the automobile tin turn them a chip likewise watery.

Included accessories: 12-cup work basin, Due south-shaped metal bract, 0.3- to 8mm adjustable slicing disk, fine and coarse reversible grating disk, dough blade, spatula, accessory storage tray

Serious Eats / Vicky Wasik

The Competition

• Cuisinart Elite Collection 2.0 xiv-Cup Food Processor: This food processor performed inconsistently and leaked when we placed h2o into it and turned it on.
• Hamilton Beach Big Oral cavity Duo xiv Cup Food Processor: Despite its size, this nutrient processor has a small chapters and leaked massively afterward we placed just 2 3/4 cups of water in it and turned it on.
• Hamilton Embankment Professional fourteen Loving cup Dicing Food Processor: This model did a fairly skilful job, up until information technology was unable to grind almond flour.
• KitchenAid fourteen-Loving cup Food Processor with Commercial-Style Dicing Kit: This model broke when we attempted to chop dates in it.
• Oster Designed for Life 14-Cup Food Processor: This model has since been discontinued.
• Kenwood Multipro Food Processor (FP959): This model has since been discontinued.
• Kenwood Multipro Excel xvi Cup Food Processor (FPM910): This model has since been discontinued.
  

FAQs

Can a blender be used as a food processor?

A blender tin perform some of the same functions as a food processor, but non all of them—and vice versa. Y'all wouldn't want to use a blender to make mirepoix or knead pizza dough, nor would you utilise a nutrient processor for blending a smoothie. A nutrient processor also comes with more attachments (like slicing and grating disks), making it more versatile.

What can a food processor do?

A food processor can chop, purée, knead, grind, shred, mince, and slice.

Can you clean a nutrient processor in the dishwasher?

A food processor'due south removable parts (its bowl, attachments, and lid) are dishwasher-safe. Its base should be wiped clean with a damp cloth. Before placing any of your nutrient processor parts in the dishwasher, we recommend checking the manufacturer'southward care instructions—merely to be condom.

boldenandenderew.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.seriouseats.com/best-food-processor-equipment-review